![]() We cover both handheld and video games platforms and the site has grown into one of the biggest gaming sites in the continent. Gamersyde is a commercial multiplatform web portal based in Europe, with hundreds of thousands of visitors each month from all over the world. Poly counts are definitely higher in the second. As far as rendering, and I've played the original Crysis many times, I still think the C2 tops it, especially with the DX11 stuff. The first vid had tons of DOF and a lot of extra camera movement, which will add a lot of realistic flair. ![]() In reply to Mods or not, the first Crysis has gotten incredibly close to photo-realistic graphics, i very much doubt the second one will top that, and for me vanilla Crysis still looks better than Crysis 2.Ĭan't really agree there. You may not be able to use the High rez texture because the may be linked to their corresponding depth maps (displacements) and not having a DX11 card may be your issue. I haven't gotten to play for more than a few minutes since the update, but I can still run the game well even with a slight (for me) hit in performance, and I've got a DX11 GTX Sath The way the bricks on walls and around edges looks really adds a lot, not to mention how many more subtle reflections there are. Poly counts are definitely higher in the second.Īs far as the new patch- this is what I wanted from C2 from the beginning. Mods or not, the first Crysis has gotten incredibly close to photo-realistic graphics, i very much doubt the second one will top that, and for me vanilla Crysis still looks better than Crysis 2.Can't really agree there. It doesn't take a huge system to run Crysis 2 on max with DX11. A lot of the people who wanted it have setups to are more than enough for Crysis 2. Horrible argument, for one anyone who begged for DirectX 11 and didn't know they're setup wasn't good enough are idiots. The video above is of a GTX 560 ti running it on max with no problems (Card runs about $200). ![]() Crytek really pushed the game that far that it has become the new benchmark in dx11 pc-gaming and crushes most PC's.Horrible argument, for one anyone who begged for DirectX 11 and didn't know they're setup wasn't good enough are idiots. What did they expect? That the new patch on ultra settings + HD textures were going to run as good as in dx9?Īnyhow: the improvements are pretty amazing, but it causes a pretty hefty performance hit. ![]() It's like Crytek can't do anything good anymore in their eyes. But now they get what they wanted (the dx11) and now most people begin to complain it doesn't run that well anymore on their PC. Before the dx11 patch, Crysis 2 looked amazing on PC and it was very well optimised so a lot of people were able to play the game at very high or extreme. The funny thing about these patches (1.9 patch and the dx11 patch) + HD textures, is that PC-gamers were so mad that Crysis 2 didn't have this at release. That's why gaming IMO is stagnant atm, this generation of gamers are a bunch of whining spoilt brat's who think they should have everything their own way. Crytek really pushed the game that far that it has become the new benchmark in dx11 pc-gaming and crushes most PC's. In reply to The funny thing about these patches (1.9 patch and the dx11 patch) + HD textures, is that PC-gamers were so mad that Crysis 2 didn't have this at release.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |